Re: Atomic rename feature for Windows.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Victor Spirin <v(dot)spirin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Atomic rename feature for Windows.
Date: 2022-04-13 07:04:03
Message-ID: YlZ147bGT8XqOTMg@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:44:31AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Generally I think supporting older systems that do funny things is
> helpful in avoiding problems that either 1) Can happen on newer
> systems but rarely 2) Can happen on other systems that people are
> using but we don't know about and aren't testing and 3) Can happen on
> future systems or future compilers and we might not even find out
> about.

Agreed. I think that things can be usually helpful. Now, I am not
really convinced that there is a strong need in running a VAX if you
are worrying about timing issues so this is a matter of balance. You
could get down to the same level of coverage with something as cheap
as a Raspberry PI or such. There are also configure switches that
emulate rather non-common behaviors, like --disable-spinlocks or
--disable-atomics that I'd rather never see gone.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-13 07:10:01 Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-13 06:50:15 Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index