Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: 2022-01-18 05:33:39
Message-ID: YeZRM7+2x86A7g/i@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:16:23PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by
> the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the
> patch and discussion.

This issue is discussed here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220117203746.oj43254j5jurbneu@alap3.anarazel.de
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com 2022-01-18 05:37:35 RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-01-18 05:14:02 Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations