| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
| Date: | 2022-01-18 04:16:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:40:54PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Okay, I created versions of the patch series for branches 13 and 14
> (.txt files). The one for HEAD is also re-attached.
FYI The patch failed today on FreeBSD, while it was previously quite stable on
all platforms (https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4551468081479680) with this error:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6360787076775936/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/regression.diffs
diff -U3 /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out
--- /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:12:52.533086000 +0000
+++ /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:28:00.000524000 +0000
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0;
?column?
----------
- t
+ f
(1 row)
I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by
the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the
patch and discussion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-01-18 04:25:15 | Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-01-18 04:13:43 | Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations |