Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Date: 2021-11-09 04:01:41
Message-ID: YYnypWBSHOa1itkP@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago.. And the patch was fine on
consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-11-09 04:03:58 Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-11-09 03:51:39 Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments