| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments |
| Date: | 2021-11-09 04:03:58 |
| Message-ID: | 54723fc8-46e6-ee4d-aa93-e932506302a3@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/11/09 13:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
>
> I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
> because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
> bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago..
:)
> And the patch was fine on
> consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-11-09 06:07:14 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-11-09 04:01:41 | Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments |