Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1
Date: 2021-09-07 06:05:19
Message-ID: YTcBHzFOpMaB0sID@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:00:01AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> The new approach looks very promising. Knowing that the file is really
> in the DELETE_PENDING state simplifies a lot.
> I've tested the patch v2_0001_Check... with my demo tests [1] and [2],
> and it definitely works.

Oho, nice. Just to be sure. You are referring to
v2-0001-Check*.patch posted here, right?
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+hUKGKj3p+2AciBGacCf_cXE0JLCYevWHexvOpK6uL1+V-zag@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-09-07 06:08:38 RE: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-09-07 06:03:38 Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate()