| From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |
| Date: | 2021-09-07 07:00:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4ed71c0d-605c-e0aa-bbdb-00adefdd59ee@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Michael,
07.09.2021 09:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:00:01AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> The new approach looks very promising. Knowing that the file is really
>> in the DELETE_PENDING state simplifies a lot.
>> I've tested the patch v2_0001_Check... with my demo tests [1] and [2],
>> and it definitely works.
> Oho, nice. Just to be sure. You are referring to
> v2-0001-Check*.patch posted here, right?
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+hUKGKj3p+2AciBGacCf_cXE0JLCYevWHexvOpK6uL1+V-zag@mail.gmail.com
Yes, i've tested that one, on the master branch (my tests needed a minor
modification due to PostgresNode changes).
Best regards,
Alexander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-09-07 07:05:08 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-07 06:51:53 | Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate() |