Re: More time spending with "delete pending"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Date: 2021-07-12 05:09:41
Message-ID: YOvOlfRrIO0yGtgw@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:07:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks, that matches my impression. There was one comment at the top
> of _pgstat64() that was still incorrect. I have spent more time
> checking and tested this stuff today, and that looks fine. One
> question pending is if we should increase the timeout used by WIN32's
> stat() and open(), but the buildfarm should be able to tell us more
> here.

And fairywren, that uses MinGW, is unhappy:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2021-07-12%2004%3A47%3A13
Looking at it now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-07-12 05:40:24 Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Previous Message Amul Sul 2021-07-12 05:00:36 Re: [CLOBBER_CACHE]Server crashed with segfault 11 while executing clusterdb