On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 10:02:30PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 8 Jul 2021, at 21:55, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> That being the case, I think we might be okay just going with the
>> solution in Adrian's last patch, ie use libldap_r if it's there
>> and otherwise assume that libldap is thread-safe. It looks
>> fairly unlikely that anyone will ever have an issue with that;
>> while if we complicate the configure probe, we might be introducing
>> new problems just from that.
>
> Absolutely, in light of that I agree that's the best option.
+1.
--
Michael