| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vitali Lovich <vlovich(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17095: ./configure fails thread_test.c when run under TSAN |
| Date: | 2021-07-08 21:42:05 |
| Message-ID: | 2045909.1625780525@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Vitali Lovich <vlovich(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've confirmed the following patch (relative to
> 45b88269a353ad93744772791feb6d01bc7e1e42) resolves the issue. It's
> predicated on the assumption that gcc or clang (or a compiler with the
> relevant builtins) are being used to build this.
You realize of course that that assumption is *completely* untenable.
I'm inclined to say that if -fsanitize=address breaks configure,
then don't include -fsanitize=address in the CFLAGS you give to
configure. It's hardly the first such restriction --- -Werror is
another one you can't inject that way, and I wouldn't be surprised
if there are more.
FWIW, I don't particularly agree with TSAN about the code being
incorrect. On what platform is a fetch or a store of an int
not atomic? (If there is one, Postgres will malfunction on it
anyway.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-09 02:25:03 | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x |
| Previous Message | Vitali Lovich | 2021-07-08 20:33:11 | Re: BUG #17095: ./configure fails thread_test.c when run under TSAN |