From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, sbernikov(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying update of row that dose not exist in target partiti |
Date: | 2021-06-12 00:21:47 |
Message-ID: | YMP+Gx2S8meYYHW4@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 04:15:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Done now. It was a highly worthwhile exercise, too, because I stumbled
> over two *other* bugs in this code while I was at it.
>
> BTW, I intentionally reworded the DEBUG messages to make sure we could
> tell the partitioned case apart from the non-partitioned one.
I have two comments about the TAP portion of ab55d74.
+$node_subscriber->append_conf('postgresql.conf', "log_min_messages = debug1");
+$node_subscriber->reload;
Wouldn't it be better to make sure that the change is effective before
moving on to the end of the test?
+my $logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber->logfile());
+ok( $logfile =~
+ qr/logical replication did not find row to be updated in replication target relation "tab_full_pk"/,
+ 'update target row is missing');
I think that it would be better here to grab the log location before
running the queries that will be matched with the logs, then pass down
the location to slurp_file().
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-12 00:31:30 | Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying update of row that dose not exist in target partiti |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-06-11 22:03:28 | Re: BUG #17056: Segmentation fault on altering the type of the foreign table column with a default |