From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix misbehavior of DROP OWNED BY with duplicate polroles entries |
Date: | 2021-06-18 23:18:18 |
Message-ID: | YM0puvBnbBIZxJt2@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:00:33PM +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fix misbehavior of DROP OWNED BY with duplicate polroles entries.
>
> Ordinarily, a pg_policy.polroles array wouldn't list the same role
> more than once; but CREATE POLICY does not prevent that. If we
> perform DROP OWNED BY on a role that is listed more than once,
> RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy either suffered an assertion failure
> or encountered a tuple-updated-by-self error. Rewrite it to cope
> correctly with duplicate entries, and add a CommandCounterIncrement
> call to prevent the other problem.
>
> Per discussion, there's other cleanup that ought to happen here,
> but this seems like the minimum essential fix.
A nit here.
+ /* If any roles remain, update the policy entry. */
+ if (num_roles > 0)
+ {
/* This is the array for the new tuple */
This indentation is incorrect.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-19 02:42:41 | Re: pgsql: Fix misbehavior of DROP OWNED BY with duplicate polroles entries |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-06-18 22:50:03 | pgsql: Add test case for obsoleting slot with active walsender |