Re: fix a comment

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "wangyukun(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangyukun(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix a comment
Date: 2021-04-24 06:13:26
Message-ID: YIO3Btqyrw+2pv37@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 07:03:40AM +0000, wangyukun(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> Agree. Please see the v2 patch which delete the number in comment.

Indeed, this set of comments became a bit obsolete after 1375422, as
you saied upthread. This simplification looks fine to me, so
applied. I am in a mood for such patches since yesterday..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2021-04-24 06:16:05 Re: fix a comment
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-04-24 06:08:04 Re: pg_identify_object_as_address() doesn't support pg_event_trigger oids