Re: extra semicolon in postgres_fdw test cases

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extra semicolon in postgres_fdw test cases
Date: 2021-03-31 04:05:03
Message-ID: YGP077tkx7uE/BVv@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:00:53PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Looks good to me as well but I think one can choose not to backpatch
> as there is no functional impact but OTOH, there is some value in
> keeping tests/code consistent.

FWIW, I would not bother with the back branches for just that, but if
you feel that this is better, of course feel free.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-03-31 04:06:40 Re: What to call an executor node which lazily caches tuples in a hash table?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-03-31 04:04:26 Re: Issue with point_ops and NaN