From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index |
Date: | 2021-03-06 01:43:43 |
Message-ID: | YELeTx8xHfTRLXec@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:27:05AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> It appears there are still some issues to be resolved with this patch, but
> the next step seems to be for you to have a look at Justin's most recent
> patch.
Not sure if I'll be able to do that by the end of this month. Looking
quicky at the patch, I am not much a fan of the new code path
introduced for the deletion of dependent objects in the partition
tree, so my gut is telling me that we need to think harder about the
problem at hand first.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-03-06 01:49:04 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2021-03-06 01:42:47 | Re: contrib/cube - binary input/output handlers |