| From: | Victor Sudakov <vas(at)sibptus(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: load balancer and connection pooling combined |
| Date: | 2021-03-03 10:34:27 |
| Message-ID: | YD9mM7+LGQcMR2Vj@admin.sibptus.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> Based on your personal experience and industry best practices, what load
> balancer combined with connection pooler can you advise?
>
> 1. I have good experience with pgpool, it's a great and robust
> connection pooler, but it cannot do load balancing and failover (or
> rather, it can do very rudimentary load balancing).
>
> 2. I have limited experience with Haproxy, it's great for load balancing
> and failover, but it's not a connection pooler, and its pgsql-check is
> not good enough, I guess you have to use an external check.
>
> Is there the "one thing to rule them all" that does all of the above and
> is well-tested and reliable?
If it could parse Patroni's REST API like Haproxy can, it would be even more perfect.
--
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49(at)fidonet
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-03-03 11:04:54 | Re: Partition table Creation and Testing using Inherited method |
| Previous Message | Victor Sudakov | 2021-03-03 09:31:58 | load balancer and connection pooling combined |