| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | harisai hari <harisai(dot)58(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TRUNCATE VIEW |
| Date: | 2021-01-27 04:44:11 |
| Message-ID: | YBDvmyBo6BghUa2K@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:54:48AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, this page is wrong to tell that.
This one has been fixed with 32bef75 down to 12.
> There is a second thing that I find confusing in the docs of
> TRUNCATE:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-truncate.html
>
> This does not mention at all partitioned tables, describing only
> "descendant tables". Partitioning is a case of "descendant tables"
> but that's a bit confusing IMO and a reader would need to guess that.
Not sure what to do about this part yet.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | - | 2021-01-27 15:44:11 | Better explanation of unnest with ordinality |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-01-26 17:56:43 | Re: Postgres upgrade does not mention requirement to have only 1 user |