Re: TRUNCATE VIEW

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: harisai hari <harisai(dot)58(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE VIEW
Date: 2021-01-26 00:54:48
Message-ID: YA9oWJWnAWT3P7l8@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:53:39PM +0530, harisai hari wrote:
> Thank you!

Yes, this page is wrong to tell that. There is a second thing that
I find confusing in the docs of TRUNCATE:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-truncate.html

This does not mention at all partitioned tables, describing only
"descendant tables". Partitioning is a case of "descendant tables"
but that's a bit confusing IMO and a reader would need to guess that.

Thoughts?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2021-01-26 06:57:53 Postgres upgrade does not mention requirement to have only 1 user
Previous Message harisai hari 2021-01-25 15:23:39 Re: TRUNCATE VIEW