Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	greenreaper(at)hotmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST
Date:	2023-01-25 11:02:56
Message-ID:	Y9EMYD1vyxjpNBSd@paquier.xyz
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2023-01-24 17:25:06 from PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>  2023-01-24 20:21:23 from "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>  2023-01-24 20:22:44 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2023-01-24 21:34:32 from Laurence Parry <greenreaper(at)hotmail(dot)com>   2023-01-25 02:45:22 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> 📎    2023-01-25 03:38:28 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2023-01-25 11:02:56 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Lists:	pgsql-docs

In response to

• Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST at 2023-01-25 03:38:28 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-docs by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Laurenz Albe	2023-01-25 22:21:13	Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
Previous Message	PG Doc comments form	2023-01-25 08:22:15	Not an error but a difficult wording