| From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | riivo(dot)kolka(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Not an error but a difficult wording |
| Date: | 2023-01-25 08:22:15 |
| Message-ID: | 167463493588.2667301.13267758265445155872@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sourcerepo.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sourcerepo.html
I was convinced that there was a missing word or something in
"because the files that these tools are used to build are included in the
tarball"
I had to read this several times, until I saw that it was actually
correct.
Maybe this would be better? (I don't know the comma rules)
"because the files(,?) that are generated/processed by these tools(,?) are
already included in the tarball"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-01-25 11:02:56 | Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-25 03:38:28 | Re: Naming of network_ops vs. inet_ops for SP-GIST |