| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count |
| Date: | 2022-12-14 01:00:13 |
| Message-ID: | Y5kgHT43XqDEc3Ev@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:17:58PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> It does raise an interesting point though, if we in the future add suppprt for
> SCRAM-SHA-512 (which seems reasonable to do) it's not good enough to have a
> single GUC for SCRAM iterations; we'd need to be able to set the iteration
> count per algorithm. I'll account for that when updating the patch downthread.
So, you mean that the GUC should be named like password_iterations,
taking a grammar with a list like 'scram-sha-256=4096,algo2=5000'?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-12-14 01:35:02 | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-12-14 00:41:05 | Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |