From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |
Date: | 2022-12-14 00:41:05 |
Message-ID: | 20221214004105.GA669835@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:20:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I certainly don't think that "wake the apply launcher every 1ms"
> is a sane configuration. Unless I'm missing something basic about
> its responsibilities, it should seldom need to wake at all in
> normal operation.
This parameter appears to control how often the apply launcher starts new
workers. If it starts new workers in a loop iteration, it updates its
last_start_time variable, and it won't start any more workers until another
wal_retrieve_retry_interval has elapsed. If no new workers need to be
started, it only wakes up every 3 minutes.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-12-14 01:00:13 | Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count |
Previous Message | David Zhang | 2022-12-14 00:40:02 | Re: Make ON_ERROR_STOP stop on shell script failure |