Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
Date: 2022-12-05 08:16:56
Message-ID: Y42o+AeAPzEv7+mZ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Means, once the current patch is committed, working on [1] and
> "cleaning" the databases one could be done in parallel. Sounds good
> to you?

Doing that in a separate patch is fine by me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-12-05 08:29:53 Order getopt arguments
Previous Message Dmitry Koval 2022-12-05 08:11:51 Re: Operation log for major operations