Re: Fix gin index cost estimation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix gin index cost estimation
Date: 2022-10-12 05:20:43
Message-ID: Y0ZOqzshes0++b1x@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> You're right, I was too eager to try to raise the CPU cost proportionnally to
> the number of array scans (scalararrayop). I'd really like to understand where
> this equation comes from though...

So, what's the latest update here?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 05:24:29 Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 05:19:25 Re: pg_get_constraintdef: Schema qualify foreign tables unless pretty printing is enabled