Re: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers
Date: 2023-02-20 23:43:06
Message-ID: Y/QFits/S6SHtMRL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:59:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This has the advantage to be able to make the difference in both
> cases, which could be important for the end-user depending on the
> context where the code is run.

In short, as of the attached, which is pretty close to the original
patch.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgfdw-appname-michael.patch text/x-diff 1.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-02-21 01:05:47 RE: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-20 22:49:25 Re: BUG #17800: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE fails to detect incompatible fields that leads to a server crash