RE: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers
Date: 2023-02-21 01:05:47
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB5866FE499C2C73F5D4E5A0ADF5A59@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Dear Michael, Horiguchi-san,

Sorry for being late.

Our first assumption was broken, so I think we should consider like that
we have missed further thing.

We should chose safer one, I +1 the Michael's idea.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles 2023-02-21 01:38:27 Re: Query run in 27s with 15.2 vs 37ms with 14.6
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-20 23:43:06 Re: BUG #17789: process_pgfdw_appname() fails for autovacuum workers