Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date: 2023-02-20 08:02:01
Message-ID: Y/Mo+UcRV7d26GHn@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:35:30PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I'm happy to move this new test to wherever folks think it should go. I'll
> look around to see if I can find a better place, too.

I think that src/test/recovery/ is the best fit, because this stresses
a code path for WAL replay on pg_class for the template db. The name
is not specific enough, though, why not just using something like
0NN_create_database.pl?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2023-02-20 08:03:01 Re: Missing free_var() at end of accum_sum_final()?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2023-02-20 07:56:22 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions (checkAsUser)