Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date: 2023-02-17 22:35:30
Message-ID: 20230217223530.GB3217365@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:13:32PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16.02.23 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
>> What's the story behind 100_bugs.pl? This name clearly is copied from
>> src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl - but I've never understood why that is
>> outside of the normal numbering space.
>
> Mainly to avoid awkwardness for backpatching. The number of tests in
> src/test/subscription/ varies quite a bit across branches.

I'm happy to move this new test to wherever folks think it should go. I'll
look around to see if I can find a better place, too.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-17 22:53:42 Re: recovery modules
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-17 22:32:43 Re: recovery modules