From: | ngpg(at)grymmjack(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more |
Date: | 2002-08-14 13:36:42 |
Message-ID: | Xns926A62250D5F59wn7t0983uom3iu23n@64.49.215.80 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Summary:
>
> 1. The current implementation is broken.
>
> 2. We have no proper description of how a "fixed" implementation
> should work.
>
> 3. It's hard to fix the current implementation without such a
> description.
>
> 4. Thus, we are in other messages here trying to work out the
> model and come up with such a description.
>
> 5. The people working this out at the moment appear to be me,
> Greg Copeland and Hannu Krosing.
>
> cjs
I've been following the thread on and off, but maybe we should come up with
a list of specifically what is broken... I have used the oo feature in the
past and the only thing I dont care for about it is the lack of
documentation/examples/etc of how it really works and the fact that
constraints/indicies/etc are not inherited by child tables.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ngpg | 2002-08-14 13:46:59 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2002-08-14 13:02:17 | Re: Inheritance |