| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more |
| Date: | 2002-08-14 04:29:03 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0208141325540.6919-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yea, you have to question what value the discussion has, really. We
> have users of inheritance that like it. If we can get a TODO item out
> of the disucssion, great, but there doesn't seem to be any direction of
> where the discussion is heading.
Summary:
1. The current implementation is broken.
2. We have no proper description of how a "fixed" implementation
should work.
3. It's hard to fix the current implementation without such a
description.
4. Thus, we are in other messages here trying to work out the
model and come up with such a description.
5. The people working this out at the moment appear to be me,
Greg Copeland and Hannu Krosing.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-14 04:30:47 | Re: db partial dumping with pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-14 04:19:13 | Re: db partial dumping with pg_dump |