Sv: Re: Logical decoding on standby

From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Sv: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Date: 2018-03-13 01:39:22
Message-ID: VisenaEmail.15.9f118cec79ac2589.1621cfd8405@tc7-visena
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

På tirsdag 13. mars 2018 kl. 01:08:03, skrev Andreas Kretschmer <
andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de <mailto:andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>>:
On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
wrote:
>On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh
><andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
>>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11?
>> 
>>--
>>Andreas Joseph Krogh
>
>Why do you think you needs this?
>
>Regards, Andreas

Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication is,
that you can define what to replicate. That wouldn't work in this way, that's
why i'm asking.

Regards, Andreas
 
I have streaming-replication of a cluster containing many databases to a
standby-server. I need a reporting-server which only needs a subset of some
(large) tables of one database and am planning to use the built-in logical
replication for that. It is my understanding that logical replication will
cause more wal-traffic so I'm trying to offload wal-traffic from the primary. I
thought using logical replication from the standby would help with that but
realized it's not supported in v10. Im I wrong in planning this way?
 
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>

 

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-13 01:40:41 Re: Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2018-03-13 00:28:11 Re: Logical decoding on standby