Re: Logical decoding on standby

From: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Date: 2018-03-13 00:08:03
Message-ID: 62255FFF-6069-471B-9B02-61D9B210346C@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> wrote:
>On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh
><andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
>>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11?
>> 
>>--
>>Andreas Joseph Krogh
>
>Why do you think you needs this?
>
>Regards, Andreas

Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication is, that you can define what to replicate. That wouldn't work in this way, that's why i'm asking.

Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-03-13 00:28:11 Re: Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2018-03-12 23:58:27 Re: Logical decoding on standby