| From: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Peter Smith' <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |
| Date: | 2022-02-25 12:52:07 |
| Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB83732CF3128D56A5F9FC1511ED3E9@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:52 PM Tang, Haiying/唐 海英 <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a comment on v21 patch.
>
> I wonder if we really need subscription s2 in 028_disable_on_error.pl. I think for
> subscription s2, we only tested some normal cases(which could be tested with
> s1), and didn't test any error case, which means it wouldn't be automatically
> disabled.
> Is there any reason for creating subscription s2?
Removed the subscription s2.
This has reduced the code amount of TAP tests.
Kindly have a look at the v22 shared in [1].
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2022-02-25 12:54:04 | RE: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |
| Previous Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2022-02-25 12:50:05 | RE: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |