From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Peter Smith' <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |
Date: | 2022-02-23 09:52:27 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB61136298DC71A5360D11AB4EFB3C9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Osumi-san,
I have a comment on v21 patch.
I wonder if we really need subscription s2 in 028_disable_on_error.pl. I think
for subscription s2, we only tested some normal cases(which could be tested with s1),
and didn't test any error case, which means it wouldn't be automatically disabled.
Is there any reason for creating subscription s2?
Regards,
Tang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Niyas Sait | 2022-02-23 10:09:36 | [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2022-02-23 09:00:03 | Re: List of all* PostgreSQL EXTENSIONs in the world |