RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Date: 2023-10-27 05:49:21
Message-ID: TYCPR01MB5870AB006475E8F672E50DC9F5DCA@TYCPR01MB5870.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Michael,

> Or you could do something even shorter, with "invalid_slots.txt".

I think current one seems better, because we only support logical replication
slots for now. We can extend as you said when we support physical slot as well.
Also, proposed length is sufficient for fairywren [1].

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACVc-WSx_fvfynt-G3j8rjhNTMZ8DHu2wiKgCEiV9EO86g%40mail.gmail.com

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-10-27 05:50:17 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-10-27 05:39:01 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node