RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: 'Katsuragi Yuta' <katsuragiy(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Ted Yu' <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Önder Kalacı' <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com'" <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Shubham Khanna' <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Date: 2024-07-26 08:07:54
Message-ID: TYCPR01MB5693504C160299B2031FA6FFF5B42@TYCPR01MB5693.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Fujii-san,

Just in case - based on the agreement in [1], I updated patches to keep them
consistent. We can use same pictures for further discussions...

IIUC, the patch which adds user_name attribute to get_connection() can be discussed
in later stage, is it right?

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/768032ee-fb57-494b-b674-1ccb65b6f969%40oss.nttdata.com

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment Content-Type Size
v44-0001-doc-Enhance-documentation-for-postgres_fdw_get_c.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB
v44-0002-postgres_fdw-Add-used_in_xact-column-to-postgres.patch application/octet-stream 10.8 KB
v44-0003-postgres_fdw-Add-connection-status-check-to-post.patch application/octet-stream 13.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michał Kłeczek 2024-07-26 08:10:38 Re: DRAFT: Pass sk_attno to consistent function
Previous Message Li, Yong 2024-07-26 07:56:12 Re: Separate HEAP WAL replay logic into its own file