From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: speed up a logical replica setup |
Date: | 2024-03-25 09:16:42 |
Message-ID: | TYCPR01MB12077D2292716B6CD4E95B2ABF5362@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> IIUC, added options were inspired by Tomas. And he said the limitation
> (pub/sub/slot
> name cannot be specified) was acceptable for the first version. I agree with him.
> (To be honest, I feel that options should be fewer for the first release)
Just to confirm - I don't think it is not completely needed. If we can agree a specification
in sometime, it's OK for me to add them. If you ask me, I still prefer Tomas's approach.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
https://www.fujitsu.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2024-03-25 09:16:50 | Re: Memory consumed by child SpecialJoinInfo in partitionwise join planning |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2024-03-25 09:09:50 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |