RE: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship

From: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship
Date: 2022-10-12 06:35:32
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB58660E913A890DC42856F9AEF5229@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Sawada-san,

> FYI, as I just replied to the related thread[1], the assertion failure
> in REL14 and REL15 can be fixed by the patch proposed there. So I'd
> like to see how the discussion goes. Regardless of this proposed fix,
> the patch proposed by Kuroda-san is required for HEAD, REL14, and
> REL15, in order to fix the assertion failure in SnapBuildCommitTxn().

I understood that my patches for REL14 and REL15 might be not needed.
I will check the thread later. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-12 06:40:21 Re: Tracking last scan time
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2022-10-12 06:22:31 Re: future of serial and identity columns