Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship
Date: 2022-10-12 07:19:54
Message-ID: CAD21AoC=McGUqM+Dw+Tm9A5B==xLq+HSF6U=cCR=juZoah_W5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 3:35 PM kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sawada-san,
>
> > FYI, as I just replied to the related thread[1], the assertion failure
> > in REL14 and REL15 can be fixed by the patch proposed there. So I'd
> > like to see how the discussion goes. Regardless of this proposed fix,
> > the patch proposed by Kuroda-san is required for HEAD, REL14, and
> > REL15, in order to fix the assertion failure in SnapBuildCommitTxn().
>
> I understood that my patches for REL14 and REL15 might be not needed.

No, sorry for confusing you. I meant that even if we agreed with the
patch I proposed there, your patch is still required to fix the issue.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-10-12 07:34:39 Re: Move backup-related code to xlogbackup.c/.h
Previous Message Виктория Шепард 2022-10-12 07:19:34 Re: Re[2]: Possible solution for masking chosen columns when using pg_dump