RE: libpq debug log

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: libpq debug log
Date: 2021-02-03 02:11:11
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB29901641C955DF260AA0B0ADFEB49@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> > + conn->fe_msg->num_fields != DEF_FE_MSGFIELDS)

> The rationale for that second condition is this: if the memory allocated
> is the initial size, we don't free memory, because it would just be
> allocated of the same size next time, and that size is not very big, so
> it's not a big deal if we just let it be, so that it is reused if we
> call PQtrace() again later. However, if the allocated size is larger
> than default, then it is possible that some previous tracing run has
> enlarged the trace struct to a very large amount of memory, and we don't
> want to leave that in place.

Ah, understood. In that case, num_fields should be max_fields.

This has reminded me that freePGconn() should free be_msg and fe_msg.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-02-03 02:18:05 Re: libpq debug log
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2021-02-03 01:28:33 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?