Re: Order of operations in postgreSQL.

From: "Ken McClaren" <ken(dot)mcclaren(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>
To: "Wetmore, Matthew (CTR)" <Matthew(dot)Wetmore(at)express-scripts(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: John Hall <john(dot)hall(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Order of operations in postgreSQL.
Date: 2023-06-01 00:21:01
Message-ID: SJ0PR04MB75994DC45BDB0159CA120278F9499@SJ0PR04MB7599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Yes, the error is correct, but it should never have occurred.
The join should have eliminated the error condition before it was evaluated by the where clause. That is the case when this type of statement is executed in SQL Server.

[Logo Description automatically generated]<http://kipuhealth.com/>
Ken McClaren
Database Administrator

864.313.5997
Easley, SC
Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/kipuhealth/> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/kipuhealth> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/KipuSystems/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/kipuhealth>
kipuhealth.com <http://kipuhealth.com/>

From: Wetmore, Matthew (CTR) <Matthew(dot)Wetmore(at)express-scripts(dot)com>
Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 4:42 PM
To: Ken McClaren <ken(dot)mcclaren(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: John Hall <john(dot)hall(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Order of operations in postgreSQL.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From your stackoverflow example. (please don’t post links, they will be hard to use in future if link expires)

This is what is happening.

Your code: TO_TIMESTAMP( trim ( substring(m.text_value, 1, 19)), 'YYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS' ) as tms

Your ERROR: ERROR: invalid value "test" for "YYYY"

Postgres logs are very clear about what is going on, if you step back and read them.

Test is in ‘’, the error says ‘test’ is invalid for YYYY

Reproduced by:

SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP( trim ( substring('test00000000000000', 1, 19)), 'YYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS' )

Returns: ERROR: invalid value "test" for "YYYY" DETAIL: Value must be an integer.

From: Ken McClaren <ken(dot)mcclaren(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 10:49 AM
To: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: John Hall <john(dot)hall(at)kipuhealth(dot)com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Order of operations in postgreSQL.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76339408/gracefully-handle-datatime-in-postgresql/76345292?noredirect=1#comment134659364_76345292<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/stackoverflow.com/questions/76339408/gracefully-handle-datatime-in-postgresql/76345292?noredirect=1*comment134659364_76345292__;Iw!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqLQJiRzg$>

Just a few notes on this issue:

PSQL:
Appears to be applying the filter to all the columns in the table after the join.

TSQL:
Tried to duplicate this behavior and got these results.

select t1.id as t1id,
cast(cast(t1.test_value as varchar(max)) as datetime) as tms
from table1 t1
join table2 t2
on t1.id = t2.id
where cast(cast(t1.test_value as varchar(max)) as datetime) > '2023-05-27'

These statements work as expected in SQL Server.

Let me know if you have any questions.

[Logo Description automatically generated]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/kipuhealth.com/__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqRvV4zTs$>
Ken McClaren
Database Administrator

864.313.5997
Easley, SC
Instagram<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.instagram.com/kipuhealth/__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqgoUJt80$> | LinkedIn<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.linkedin.com/company/kipuhealth__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFq4jhwZ7o$> | Facebook<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.facebook.com/KipuSystems/__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqmAVwRsA$> | Twitter<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/twitter.com/kipuhealth__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqhlgrdYI$>
kipuhealth.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/kipuhealth.com/__;!!GFE8dS6aclb0h1nkhPf9!8Gbv5mGohfEUVtNgQr_HkTXYFeKYHD0lMrw5Y6OTGKntYkX1Qx48MamQOTZ0rwUKgbMWIYRORorLk5i2akjNuSmiQZJf6SFqRvV4zTs$>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Thakkar 2023-06-01 06:42:06 Re: BUG #17940: PostgreSQL Installer For Windows Cannot Initialize Cluster When BeyondTrust Installed
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-05-31 23:42:45 Re: BUG #17947: Combination of replslots pgstat issues causes error/assertion failure