From: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pg_restore new option -m |
Date: | 2009-02-18 17:55:53 |
Message-ID: | Pine.UW2.4.63.0902181845190.9918@sun.pyrenet |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hi,
i've been testing new -m option of pg_restore with great pleasure.
first, let me thank the developpers, it cut restoring time by half.
is it normal that -m doesn't cope well with -C?
createdb db
pg_restore -m 4 -d db db.dmp
works like a charm while
pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
gives numerous errors, mostly no such relation at index creation time.
TIA
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-18 18:01:15 | Re: graph representation of data structures in optimizer |
Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-02-18 17:46:11 | Re: Multi calendar system for pgsql |