Re: Multi calendar system for pgsql

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi calendar system for pgsql
Date: 2009-02-18 17:46:11
Message-ID: 20090218174611.GR32672@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:50:31PM +0330, Mohsen Alimomeni wrote:
> Multi calendar systems are useful for several languages and countries using
> different calendar: Hijri, Persian, Hebrew, etc.

When would the differences between these calenders actually show
up? I can only think of it affecting input/output routines and the
date_part,date_trunc,to_date and to_char routines. But am I missing
something?

If that's all, then how about just treating the current PG
date types as Julian days (as far as I know, that's how it's
treated internally anyway) and providing a multi-calender set of
date_part,date_trunc,to_date and to_char routines. I.e. leave out the
input/output routines.

Doing this would be much easier, but less fun, than creating whole new
types and having to modify the parser as well to recognize the new
syntax.

--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2009-02-18 17:55:53 pg_restore new option -m
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-02-18 17:33:38 Re: The science of optimization in practical terms?