Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Paul,
>
>> Your main concern about RT isn't true, at least here at my office. I
>> installed RT, with no prior experience with any OSS tracker, back in
>> October, and it worked on PostgreSQL the first time. (PostgreSQL support was
>> one of the main reasons I chose it to track issues on my
>> PostgreSQL/Perl-based webapp.) I made this point in an earlier post in this
>> thread. There is no conversion effort needed with RT 3.0.6, it just works on
>> PostgreSQL.
>
> My apologies, then! I was operating off of the statements of others, and the
> fact that the only RT impelementations I've used were running on MySQL. So,
> questions:
>
> 1) can you compare/contrast RT vs. BZ vs. Simplified bug-tracking, like
> GForge?
I can't help here, but...
>
> 2) What help, if any, would we be able to get in supporting RT from the RT
> community?
RT community is VERY good, the rt-users list is REAL good, and Jesse
Vincent (the primary author) is VERY good about keeping PG support
up to date, and making the improvements necessary.

I run a RT on PG here as well.

LER

>
> --
> -Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749