pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
>The best phrasing would be "the accumulating overhead of deletes and
>updates."
>
>Yes.
>
>
Are you using 7.3?
I am asking because in 7.3 high update / delete tables could suffer
(index and toast) bloat that was untamable via (lazy) VACUUM and FSM.
I believe this is fixed in 7.4, so it should be possible to achieve on
disk size control of tables / indexes by configuring FSM and (lazy)
VACUUM. Did you find this not to be the case?
regards
Mark