Re: Unixware 714 pthreads

From: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Date: 2004-10-28 15:38:23
Message-ID: Pine.UW2.4.53.0410281728100.8642@server.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry to follow up my own post.

I made some more tests:
create table foo (f1 int) -- for it not to be removed if if kill the
process

each time I do:
psql template1
template1# set statement_timeout=1000;
SET
template1 select block_me();

it works ok

if i do it a second time in the same session, blockme() never returns

I wonder if handle_sig_alarm is re-armed after being used or if sleep is
used anywhere in the backend.

Unixware doc for setitimer
(http://www.pyrenet.fr:8458/en/man/html.3C/getitimer.3C.html)
says that "A sleep following a setitimer wipes out knowledge of the user
signal handler"

What can I do next?

Regards
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:

> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:01:45 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
> Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
>
> Dear Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I was desperate I did'nt get one!
>
> As I said, I'm quite sure there is a bug in pthread library, Before saying
> this to SCO, I have to prove it. Postgresql is the way to prove it!
>
> What I need is to know where to start from (I'd like to put elogs where
> statement_timeout is processed to see what really happens and why it
> doesn't cancel the query).
>
> Could someone tell me where to look for? If anyone is interessed in
> debugging this issue with me, I can set up an account on a test unixware
> machine.
>
> TIA
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 714 pthreads
> >
> >
> > The only help I can be is that on Unixware (only) the backend is
> > compiled with threading enabled. This might be showing some thread
> > bugs.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:
> > > Hi every one,
> > >
> > > I need help to debug the problem I have on Unixware 714 and beta3.
> > > postgresql make check hangs on plpgsql test when compiled with
> > > --enable-thread-safty.
> > >
> > > It does hang on select block_me();
> > >
> > > This select should be canceled by the set statement_timeout=1000, instead,
> > > the backend is 100% CPU bound and only kill -9 can kill it.
> > >
> > > It works ok when compiled without -enable-thread-safty.
> > >
> > > I've tried almost every thing I could think of, but not knowing so much
> > > about threads and PG source code, I request that someone can help me as to
> > > find a way to debug this. It worked up until beta2, but I'm not sure
> > > block_me()was there.
> > >
> > > I really need someone to tell me where to begin.
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > --
> > > Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
> > > 6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
> > > 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
> > > FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> > > joining column's datatypes do not match
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2004-10-28 16:11:10 Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2004-10-28 15:16:50 Re: