From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2004-10-28 15:16:50 |
Message-ID: | F80E2DAF94C32A5A82B8EFB0@sparkey.oopsware.intra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Dienstag, Oktober 26, 2004 23:44:10 +0300 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
wrote:
>
> Thus I think that reserved keyword is what it is meant to be in the
> first place ;)
Yes, that was my intention, too. That's because i went straight forward and
put it in the reserved keyword list and didn't spent time on playing around
with it as a non-reserved keyword. I expect somebody wouldn't agree with
this, since it will break things if somebody has something odd like
CREATE VIEW vblabla
AS
SELECT
*
FROM
FOO AS WITH;
--
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ohp | 2004-10-28 15:38:23 | Re: Unixware 714 pthreads |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-28 14:39:06 | Re: pg_get_serial_sequence is inconsistent |