From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-10 09:23:40 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207101821320.21914-100000@angelic.cynic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Richard Huxton wrote:
> The "did you mean..." message is obviously something they can configure.
I don't see why it's "obviously" something they can configure, if
you mean it's easy to do and they're prepared to do it for us. I
suspect that they're just recording historical data on searches,
or looking for similar words that matched the found documents and
a lot more, or something like that. However, a request to have them
always suggest PostgreSQL when someone types in postgres might be
worthwhile, if we decide we really want to stick with PostgreSQL
for ever and ever.
> PS - I use "PostgreSQL", "Postgres", "pgsql" and even "PG" depending on how
> tired with typing I am. There is nothing wrong with the official name (imho)
> but if we are going to use alternatives it'd be nice if any searches would
> match on it.
I don't think it's likely we'd ever achieve that on a broad basis.
There are just too many search engines out there....
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | omid omoomi | 2002-07-10 09:24:22 | Time zone problem |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2002-07-10 09:08:50 | Re: PostgreSQL / Reporting tool |