| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CVSup |
| Date: | 1998-05-01 11:22:20 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.95.980501072203.19987C-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Brett McCormick wrote:
>
> This may be the totally wrong place for asking this question, but what
> exactly *is* CVSup?
See ftp.postgresql.org:/pub/CVSup ...
>
> On Fri, 1 May 1998, at 08:36:05, Maurice Gittens wrote:
>
> > I don't understand the problem CVSup is intended to solve given
> > that CVS allows remote access to the repository using standard cvs
> > commands. Is there a specific reason why we can't/don't have readonly access
> > to the postgresql repository?
> >
> > I think it's neat to be able to use commands like "cvs diff" etc. However
> > I really hate it that my changes seem to get overwritten why I using
> > CVSup since this doesn't happen when using the "cvs update".
> >
> > Can anyone explain why this is the way it is?
> >
> > Thanks, with regards from Maurice.
> >
> >
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rasmus Lerdorf | 1998-05-01 11:36:48 | Re: [HACKERS] CVSup |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-05-01 11:22:00 | Re: [HACKERS] CVSup |