| From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CVSup |
| Date: | 1998-05-01 06:45:14 |
| Message-ID: | 13641.28506.987413.25521@abraxas.scene.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This may be the totally wrong place for asking this question, but what
exactly *is* CVSup?
On Fri, 1 May 1998, at 08:36:05, Maurice Gittens wrote:
> I don't understand the problem CVSup is intended to solve given
> that CVS allows remote access to the repository using standard cvs
> commands. Is there a specific reason why we can't/don't have readonly access
> to the postgresql repository?
>
> I think it's neat to be able to use commands like "cvs diff" etc. However
> I really hate it that my changes seem to get overwritten why I using
> CVSup since this doesn't happen when using the "cvs update".
>
> Can anyone explain why this is the way it is?
>
> Thanks, with regards from Maurice.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 1998-05-01 07:12:00 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: CODE ANALYSIS FOR (an apparent error in answer from "##" (closest proximity)operator) |
| Previous Message | Maurice Gittens | 1998-05-01 06:36:05 | CVSup |